Some negatives he mentioned about Algor are that it does not do EMS studies only electrostatics Ansys is better at this. Also, Algor's fluid flow cannot analyze compressible fluids above Mach 1.
Again, I believe Ansys can do this well. These two limitations will not impact our ability to analyze the parts we build. One more thing keep in mind that this is an Algor salesperson talking to me an Algor salesperson said they just won out an FEA study against Abaqus with one of their customers. Just some additional input I thought was relevant. To sum it up please do not overlook any FEA solution.
I initially had my doubts about Algor. I remember their early interface being terrible ie DOS like. I also did not realize at the time that they could perform kinematic analysis. An Algor salesperson called me up, and said they could do all of our analysis requirements. Again, for the money and it's capabilities I believe nothing can beat Algor! PS I do not work for Algor.
I'm just impressed with their capabilities, their cost, and their tight integration with our CAD package. How do you work with algor? You do use SD modeling or instead model on SW and use incad to import to algor? I had come experience with Algor13, and modeling was slow. I agree with you that there is no reason why a moderatelly priced system will not have the same capabilities compared to others with higher price tags.
They get their revenue from a higher sales volume or so I think, and hope sancat. I do not intend to start a "best-software" argument, as this is like arguing religion. However, my take on dmech's statement was not a slight on ALGOR, but rather an acknowledgement of him having considered them. ALGOR is often not a consideration within the markets that often use the other codes to which he refers.
However, ALGOR as you have suggested can be viable for people, and I took his comment to mean that one may want to consider this lower-priced alternative. Regarding your statements in general, I would add that ABAQUS as a package basic, as delivered, with no add-ons can do all that you have suggested, including the kinematics. They are clearly a good fit for you, but don't imply from your experiences that they would fit for all as no software does that.
Regards, Brad. I would like to state again, watch out for the checkbox mentality. Although a software package says it can do a type of analysis, that doesn't mean it can do them well. I have met many an unhappy user that were surprised when the cheap FEA software they picked could not solve their real production problem.
How much does the sofware cost when the engineer has to spend 10 times longer to get the problem to run? You want to evaluate software based on your specific problem. Best regards and good luck. In general, our FE applications are not complex, but can cover both static and dynamic analysis. I guess I wish they were a bit cheaper so it wasn't such an investment to try them out.
Really high end analysis where Strand7 chokes only comes up a few times a year. Greg: Thanks for suggesting the idea of making specialised apps in addition to the FEA package. I gave a thought to it and now I have some more specialised areas like gears, cams, fasteners, etc. Rob: As mentioned previously, I have a long term plan of setting up a consultancy.
So right now I am not looking at really accurate figures. Just rough estimates to understand how much I would have to invest and whether or not my business would be able to sustain.
Overall I understand that FEA alone could possibly not sustain my business. I have to work on some related activities Rapid Prototyping maybe? Rick: Yeah the software is going to be a huge investment. So I am seriously contemplating developing my own software. Also I would never sustain the business with these high investments as people want everything cheap over here. Recently it failed to deliver a very simple multi-body simulation despite having very short intervals for non-linear analysis.
The mesh was mostly prismatic but not very fine. Unfortunately, I can't post prices on a userboard. Please email me directly and I can get you connected with the appropriate people. I was looking for a cheap FEA software and they recommend me Heron rotordynamics in another forum. It's cost less than usd per month! Just before you get booted off the site, perhaps having a website that is not accessible without a password is not the best way to drum up business? Hi, I'm in charge of the FEA team in an automotive company, so we deal and suffer with that numbers, please send me a PM if you need the real numbers.
Guess that is not possible to post it directly. I'll just rock the boat a bit in the spirit of balance! I would agree with the general points about Autodesk Simulation. However, I would not write off Autodesk just yet. I purchased Algor at the height of the crash at the end of It was as much as a toy as anything and because I could afford it. Abaqus and Ansys are total non-runners for individuals unless you have a near full time use which pays top dollar.
Since then I have been very impressed with Autodesk and kept the licence paid up. I suspect that Autodesk will get their break at some time soon. End users of FEA services will wake up at some time and realise that they do not need to pay for work done with Abaqus and Ansys. Neither guarantees that it will be correct.
Big name consultants with big name software can and do use screwy boundary conditions with very pretty but equally screwy models to produce meaningless rubbish. The same rubbish can be produced with less famous software at a fraction of the price. If one wants to deal with clients who only want big name software and are willing to pay for it, then there is no point considering Autodesk Simulation just yet.
However, there are other more price sensitive clients. You pays you money etc. I am not quite sure why you'd need to pay for software to produce rubbish results, but it's your money. I know Greg was joking, but I think 4Pipes makes a valid point.
For the great majority of applications reasonably priced software will produce just as good results as the software from the big names. The results need to be independently verified by some means anyway; relying on the name of the software supplier doesn't sound like a great verification method. I'd like to see more price competition from all software suppliers, and easily accessible fixed prices would be a good start.
Whether Autodesk will be useful in driving prices down in the long term, I doubt. Sure for simple structures. I'm a great believer in simple FEA models, and have correlated three node models very successfully, at least to a level that demonstrated their usefulness - that is where static deflection was an issue we got good agreement on spring rate, and for dynamics we got good modal results within the frequency range of interest.
Most people don't correlate their models to any serious extent, they just want pretty pictures. Just want to make it clear that if it is illegal to discuss the actual price of the software then I would not want to know the actual figures. I don't think there is any crime to discuss rough estimates as done above and am satisfied with the information.
Regarding the reputation of the software I believe only one principle: Garbage in, Garbage out. A tool is only as good as the operator is. The , to 10,, node model is for confirming the node model, not for first instance design. Question always arises: why am I paying you to do a fancy model if you have to do testing too? I was just being tongue in cheek.
I have tried to reverse engineer calcs in the past - basic stuff so nothing really fancy. The software provides a settings dialog box, a parametric table and a simulation guide to assist you with the simulation process. In addition, Autodesk also offers Inventor Nastran, which they define as a CAD-embedded finite element analysis software.
It is only available when subscribing to their Product Design and Manufacturing Collection. This software should work as an extension to the FEA capabilities provided by Inventor. It includes a wider variety of studies and materials for your analysis. For example, the possibility of running linear and nonlinear stress, dynamics, and heat transfer studies. It prides itself on its design-to-manufacturing capabilities.
Among the main features found within SolidWorks, the possibility to work with large and complex assemblies stands out. It is possible to work on a simple model and scale into a full facility complex.
These modules include:. The module comes in three levels: Standard, Professional and Premium. Obviously the latter is the most powerful version and includes:. In addition, the creator offers complements to SolidWorks Simulation. They range from flow simulation and plastic packages to more specific solutions. For example, the Electronics Cooling and Sustainability modules provide you with options to validate your design.
All of these packages and modules are embedded in the 3D CAD software. Solid Edge is a complete portfolio of product development tools offered by Siemens. The prominent German company offers tools for mechanical and electrical design, simulation, manufacturing, technical publications, data management and much more.
In the latest release of Solid Edge, we can find many new features. These include advanced technologies such as augmented reality and the ability to completely digitalise the design-to-manufacturing process. Another outstanding feature included in Solid Edge is the optimisation for both additive and subtractive manufacturing.
A range of manufacturing processes can be defined and executed, including:. You can do it early in the design process to reduce the need for rapid prototyping and save time and costs. Creo is another well-known company in the design and engineering community. Creo offers scalable 3D CAD product development packages and tools.
Those tools feature modelling and design, simulation and analysis, augmented reality and additive manufacturing. In addition to the 3D design capabilities that you may find in any software, Creo offers possibilities for knowledge-based design. Such an interface will allow the customization of menus and tools on a per-user basis to make frequently used features easily accessible. An FEA application can create voluminous data that users may find difficult to understand.
The best products will allow you to format your results in ways that provide for rapid interpretation. So, pay close attention to the analytics and reporting capabilities of the products you consider. Make sure that you choose software that provides toolkits and macros for automating the capture of information by the pre and post processor.
Also, an application interface API can provide for the automated exchange of data between your FEA software and other applications. In other words, look for software that allows for the automation and customization of workflows.
Meanwhile, automation tools should allow analysts to adjust their models and analyses while streamlining repetitive and time-consuming tasks. Additionally, you should find out if the price of your software includes periodic software updates, upgrades, and bug fixes.
By asking questions about the maintenance and support that comes with a software product, you can avoid surprises that may include downtime and support fees. You should also inquire about onsite support costs and the availability of self-service support options. Generally, you should avoid software that lacks flexibility. You need to have the option to easily add user licenses and other features when necessary. For the most part, you should avoid these. After all, learning a command line interface will require extended learning curves and limit your business in terms of flexibility, efficiency, and speed.
Finally, never shop only by price. Some vendors may offer low prices to entice you. For instance, some may require additional fees for accessing features that are included in the base price of a competing product. However, by analyzing the needs of your business and forecasting your future requirements, you can choose the software product that will provide you with the features you need at a competitive price. Also, whenever possible, take advantage of free trial periods and product demonstrations.
Explore our list of top finite element analysis software solutions and reviews to help you find the best software for your business. Software Categories. Research Resources. Log In Create Account. Home All Categories Solution list.
0コメント