Kanchan Jain on 6. Soon after the marriage Mukti Jain was harassed and the two applicants started demanding dowry of Rs. However, the prayer of the father was unheeded and ultimately on Accompanied by his another daughter Kirti Jain the informant reached at the house of Deep Chand Jain on She was not being properly treated medically. When the informant brought his daughter back with him her in-laws had not returned her ornaments and stridhan.
On Nursing Home Mainpuri for which the in-laws were informed but they did not care for her. After that Respondent No. Ultimately on 6. Because of the aforesaid litigation on With such allegations a F. The usual investigation ultimately culminated into filing of a final report favourable to the applicants by the police on Investigating Officer came to the conclusion that informant intentionally does not want to send his daughter to her in-laws house because Mukti Jain is doing service in district Mainpuri and she also does not want to join the company of her husband and her in-laws and the allegations of demand of dowry and torture are false and fabricated.
The final report was objected to by filing of protest petition on In support of his protest petition the informant Vijay Kumar Jain has examined himself in Court. The trial Magistrate C. Act hence this application to quash the whole proceeding and the summoning order. After going through the averments made in the F. There are allegations for demand of dowry and threatening of the wife who is the daughter of the informant Respondent No. At this stage the allegations levelled are to be taken to be correct on its face value.
No addition or subtraction is possible at this stage nor the critical appreciation of facts alleged can be undertaken to fetch out a defence for the accused and thwart a legitimate prosecution at its very inception. One fact I would like to mention here that in this matter since the dispute was between the husband and wife, this Court granted chance to the respective sides to come to the compromise by reconciliatory proceedings through an order dated Since the offence is disclosed and the summoning order does not suffer from any infirmity of law, the prosecution of Complaint Case No.
Kotwali Mainpuri, district Mainpuri cannot be quashed. This application is meritless and is hereby dismissed. Interim order dated Advocates List. For Petitioner : V. Gupta, Adv. For Respondent : A. For Respondent S. Vani B. Sunita Rao Sushil Kumar Pathak. Bench List. Eq Citation. Thank you for subscribing! Please check your inbox to opt-in. Oh no, error happened! Sending your Problem Please wait Close Send. Loading Data.. Enabling Editing Mode..
Update Cancel Cancel. Deleting Note.. This example shows how to obtain the user context and create a service client. For information about creating service clients, see Invoking a service using a Java client library. For this example, the class defining the methods in which LiveCycle services are invoked is called LiveCycleServiceInvoker. The ReviewProcessActionExecuter. This example contains the logic that is contained within the ReviewProcessActionExecuter.
This example shows the entire implementation of the ReviewProcessActionExecuter class, in which the business logic is contained in the executeImp method, and the parameters are added through the addParameterDefinitions method. See Invoking a service using a Java client library.
This example shows the implementation of the LiveCycleServiceInvoker class that contains the application logic for creating a service client and invoking the service or process, which is used by the ReviewProcessActionExecuter. The primary logic in which the invocation request is created is in the invokeOperation method shown in this example. The user interface resources may be defined through the action and parameter messages, the action JavaServer page JSP , an action handler, a Spring configuration file that is used to register the action as a bean, and a configuration file.
To deploy a custom action, see Creating Custom Actions. Adobe LiveCycle. Invoking LiveCycle services from Custom Actions. Defining your application logic Creating a custom model Implementing the action executor class Implementing the invoker class Defining the user interface resources Packaging and deploying the custom action component. View full size graphic. Start Advanced Process vs.
Summary of steps To develop a custom action, perform the following steps: Set up your development environment. Define your application logic. Define the user interface resources. Package and deploy the component. Defining your application logic Perform the following steps: Creating a custom model Implementing the action executor class Implementing the invoker class. Creating a custom model To define a custom model, in some cases, create a custom model to contain the new aspect and tags to be assigned by the user.
Implementing the action executor class The custom action consists of an ActionExecutor class and its associated bean declaration. Implementing the custom action The executeImpl method is where the custom action business logic resides. The following example shows how to inject services. Obtaining the user context This example shows how to obtain the user context and create a service client.
Defining the ReviewProcessActionExecuter implementation This example shows the entire implementation of the ReviewProcessActionExecuter class, in which the business logic is contained in the executeImp method, and the parameters are added through the addParameterDefinitions method. ArrayList; import java. List; import org. ParameterDefinitionImpl; import org.
ActionExecuterAbstractBase; import org. Action; import org. ParameterDefinition; import org. DataTypeDefinition; import org. NodeRef; import org. NodeService; import org. AuthenticationService; import org.
PersonService; import org. QName; import com. UserManagerUtils; import com. CSContentModel; import com. CSModulesLogger; import com. Context; import com. DSCException; import com. ServiceClientFactory; import com. ActionExecuterAbstractBase executeImpl org.
0コメント